[Vtigercrm-developers] Quality vs. Features

[Joe Bordes]

I'm sorry to say that I couldn't have expressed it better.

Joe
TSolucio

El vie, 27-10-2006 a las 04:34 -0700, Ken Lyle escribió:
> Couldn't agree more with Dirk.
> 
> When basic, core, "101" features like showing the
> correct version numbers on patches are slipping
> through the cracks...How does one deploy a web based
> CRM system, but rely on Outlook?  That makes no sense
> to me, from an IT perspective.
> 
> When relatively bright people (me) are spending DAYS
> trying to migrate from Sugar...Almost a joke that
> Richie is publicly wondering how to get more users
> while it's like punishment trying to convert.
> 
> When the email client appears to be completely broken,
> at least in my install...
> 
> Please "circle the wagons", and fix what's there
> before introducing more (broken) features.
> 
> Personally, I am stuck on Sugar because I have inbound
> and outbound email that works, and associates the
> history to my Contacts correctly...my custom fields
> are broken by one of the upgrades, but at least I have
> basic functionality.
> 
> Here is a simplified version of the 3 month roadmap:
> 
> <Roadmap>
> QUALITY
> </Roadmap>
> 
> Wherever I am mistaken, I will stand for correction...
> 
> Regards,
> Ken
> 
> > From: Dirk Gorny <Dirk.Gorny at genion.de>
> > Subject: Re: [Vtigercrm-developers] Fwd: Road map
> 
> > nice Road map, but I dont understand the point of
> > view causes this List.
> > If you point an application to a business
> > environment there are more important 
> > attributes than features.
> 
> 
> 484-948-5706
> 866-OUT OF BOX
> (866-688-6326)
>