[Vtigercrm-developers] Installation Problem in Version 6.0

[Sreenivas Kanumuru]

Yes, we plan to include the patch suffix also in the bin/exe/tar.gz file
names.


On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Alan Lord <alanslists at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 19/03/14 09:57, Sreenivas Kanumuru wrote:
>
>> We discussed this further, and felt that changing the version to 6.0.1
>> might require lot of book keeping work (with svn tagging, extensions
>> should be marked to work with 6.0.1, .etc). For security patches that do
>> not change functionality, we decided to leave the primary version as
>> 6.0.0, and add a suffix. So, it would be 6.0.0 (1) or 6.0.0 (2). This
>> version will be shown in the footer, when you install fresh from the
>> EXE, or if you install the Security patch directly on an existing 6.0.0
>> install. Please let me know if you have any concerns.
>>
>
> Hi Sreenivas, that sounds fine to me.
>
> As far as I am concerned, as long as there is some way of knowing that the
> code isn't the same as the "other tarball" that is called 6.0.0 then it
> doesn't really matter how you indicate that.
>
> As long as the suffix is __also__ indicated in the tarball name, e.g.
> "vtigercrm-6.0.0-1.tar.gz" then I'm fine with this.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.vtiger.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-developers/attachments/20140319/d7872d39/attachment.html>