[Vtigercrm-developers] A new approach to telephony integration

[Sreenivas Kanumuru]

Thanks, Alan. I agree, SIPProxy looks to be the better option. We haven't
started digging into it yet. We'll update this thread after making some
progress.

--
Sreenivas Kanumuru
vtiger Team

Direct: +91 96323-55656
Skype: skanumuru

*Connect with us on: *Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/vtigercrm> *I*
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/vtiger/226866697333578?sk=wall> *I*
Blog <http://blog.vtiger.com/>* I*
Wiki<http://wiki.vtiger.com/index.php/Main_Page>
 *I *Forums  <http://forums.vtiger.com/>*I* Website <http://vtiger.com/>


On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Alan Lord <alanslists at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 27/09/13 15:34, Sreenivas Kanumuru wrote:
>
>> Alan,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing this. We are looking at Asterisk -Java
>> <http://www.asterisk-java.org/**development/<http://www.asterisk-java.org/development/>>
>> to improve the Asterisk
>>
>> integration in the open source product. But, OpenSIPs looks better from
>> what you shared, and the fact that it is not just restricted to Asterisk
>> is a plus. We will keep you posted if we make some progress on OpenSIPs.
>>
>
> Using a SIP proxy is a much better solution. It means:
>
> * no dependance on a specific type of VOIP switch, e.g. Asterisk
> * scales much better than AGI/AMI: no need to poll or wait for external
> messages regarding call status - the proxy just *knows* this
> * supports both private and commercially hosted switch scenarios
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> http://www.vtiger.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-developers/attachments/20130930/d758111e/attachment-0001.html>