[Vtigercrm-developers] Custom Date Fields still broken in Reports

Mon Oct 19 16:22:42 GMT 2015

Alan,

this would be great, much better to have pull requests rather than managing
> fixes through the mailing list

Yep.

Simone,

We are planning to set a goal of 5-6 months for next release. This should
give us good amount of time to focus on dev + collaboration
on other activities.

I'm humble towards all the extended support you members are offering -
which helps us to sit tight on the desk for dev-tasks. Feeling blessed.

Regards,
Prasad

--
FB <http://www.facebook.com/vtiger> I Twit <http://twitter.com/vtigercrm> I
LIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/1270573?trk=tyah> I Blog
<https://blogs.vtiger.com> I Website <https://www.vtiger.com/>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Simone Travaglini <
simonetravaglini at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi prasad,
> thanks for answer.
> Do you have a timeline for future relase? I think could be usefull for us
> to know what's in your mind for the future.
> Anyway thanks for your work and support.
>
> 2015-10-19 16:22 GMT+02:00 Prasad <prasad at vtiger.com>:
>
>> Vtiger 6.4 enables multi-layout support
>> <http://community.vtiger.com/help/vtigercrm/developers/extensions/examples/layout-i386-v1.html>
>> and Vtiger 7 on Ondemand builds on-top of this framework.
>>
>> The version difference is mainly for due to significant UI changes being
>> offered on the service (than earlier) .
>> This new-layout is still under development is updates are pushed
>> every-day. Which is a bit of challenge to achieve
>> the same as product releases.
>>
>>
>> Is Vtiger being abandoned very slowy?
>>
>>
>> No.
>>
>> The on demand can happily always offer more features than the os version.
>>> But vtiger should put those features up on the marketplace as modules so
>>> that we can buy those for our os installations and don't have to reinvent
>>> the wheel all the time.
>>
>>
>> Features developed for Ondemand are dependent on home-grown services which
>> cease to work without it. So moving them on to marketplace is not
>> possible.
>>
>> The vtiger forum and this mailing list are very bad to use. So is the svn
>>> repository. If you want us open source users and developers actually
>>> contribute, consider moving the repository to a modern repo like github,
>>> offer a nice to use platform for everyone, don't be stuck with the dodgy
>>> sourceforge and become fakers like they are.
>>
>>
>> We are ambitious to migrate trac.vtiger.com to new-repository, our
>> operation
>> team did experiment with Gitlab and confident to turn it to production
>> sooner.
>>
>> Answer the question: Do you want us to contribute?
>>
>>
>> Yes - we appreciate it as always.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Prasad
>> Vtiger Team
>>
>>
>> --
>> FB <http://www.facebook.com/vtiger> I Twit <http://twitter.com/vtigercrm>
>>  I LIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/1270573?trk=tyah> I Blog
>> <https://blogs.vtiger.com> I Website <https://www.vtiger.com/>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Preexo <preexo at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think having a 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and a 6.4 (4-5 versions) within this year
>>> sounds pretty damn good and like progress at first!!
>>> ... If there wasn't the on demand version which feels like it's already
>>> at
>>> 7.4. And officially this should still be the same product, right?
>>> Money... Money is nice, money is what drives us all. It's why I keep
>>> coming
>>> back here... Because it's my job and I earn money with this. So don't
>>> stop
>>> earning money, but running a successful open source project doesn't mean
>>> you
>>> can't earn money... vtiger has the potential of being part of this list:
>>>
>>> http://www.infoworld.com/article/2982622/open-source-tools/bossie-awards-2015-the-best-open-source-applications.html
>>> For sure all of them earn money and are still more open source than
>>> vtiger.
>>>
>>> The vtiger team should not feel pushed, but this really needs to be
>>> answered. I also think the gap between on demand and open source becomes
>>> more and more fishy. Is the open source project actually being abandoned
>>> very slowly?
>>>
>>> From my point of view:
>>> - The on demand can happily always offer more features than the os
>>> version.
>>> But vtiger should put those features up on the marketplace as modules so
>>> that we can buy those for our os installations and don't have to reinvent
>>> the wheel all the time.
>>> - The vtiger forum and this mailing list are very bad to use. So is the
>>> svn
>>> repository. If you want us open source users and developers actually
>>> contribute, consider moving the repository to a modern repo like github,
>>> offer a nice to use platform for everyone, don't be stuck with the dodgy
>>> sourceforge and become fakers like they are.
>>> - Answer the question: Do you want us to contribute? Do you want to
>>> actually
>>> live the open source spirit? Do you want to stop maintaining two
>>> products?
>>>
>>> @Stacey, do you actually know a fork of vtiger that is somewhere near
>>> ready
>>> to be joined?
>>>
>>>
>>> Stacey Johnson wrote
>>> > The answer is: Join or create alternative fork/project.
>>> > No open source spirit around vtiger core. Money.
>>> >
>>> > Stacey
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Simone Travaglini <
>>>
>>> > simonetravaglini@
>>>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Alan I hope with your importance in community you will get an answer.
>>> :)
>>> >> Many people asked to know about long term plan... but not answer yet!
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2015-10-16 13:57 GMT+02:00 Alan Lord <
>>>
>>> > alanslists@
>>>
>>> > >:
>>> >>
>>> >>> It's a shame something like this didn't get addressed in 6.4.0:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://trac.vtiger.com/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/8625
>>> >>>
>>> >>> In fact this is a pretty boring release with very little to warrant a
>>> >>> new
>>> >>> version number. It's seems more like a 6.3.1 to me.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I also note that the gap between the On-Demand and Open Source
>>> versions
>>> >>> continues to grow wider... What is the long-term plan here?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Al
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> http://www.vtiger.com/
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Simone Travaglini
>>> >> 328 5499846
>>> >> Linkedin: Simone Travaglini
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Rispetta l'ambiente: non stampare questa mail se non ti è veramente
>>> >> necessario!
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> http://www.vtiger.com/
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > http://www.vtiger.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://vtiger-crm.2324883.n4.nabble.com/Vtigercrm-developers-Custom-Date-Fields-still-broken-in-Reports-tp17722p17754.html
>>> Sent from the vtigercrm-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> http://www.vtiger.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.vtiger.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Simone Travaglini
> 328 5499846
> Linkedin: Simone Travaglini
>
>
> Rispetta l'ambiente: non stampare questa mail se non ti è veramente
> necessario!
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.vtiger.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-developers/attachments/20151019/4594630a/attachment-0001.html>