[Vtigercrm-developers] Custom Date Fields still broken in Reports

[Prasad]

Vtiger 6.4 enables multi-layout support
<http://community.vtiger.com/help/vtigercrm/developers/extensions/examples/layout-i386-v1.html>
and Vtiger 7 on Ondemand builds on-top of this framework.

The version difference is mainly for due to significant UI changes being
offered on the service (than earlier) .
This new-layout is still under development is updates are pushed every-day.
Which is a bit of challenge to achieve
the same as product releases.


Is Vtiger being abandoned very slowy?


No.

The on demand can happily always offer more features than the os version.
> But vtiger should put those features up on the marketplace as modules so
> that we can buy those for our os installations and don't have to reinvent
> the wheel all the time.


Features developed for Ondemand are dependent on home-grown services which
cease to work without it. So moving them on to marketplace is not possible.

The vtiger forum and this mailing list are very bad to use. So is the svn
> repository. If you want us open source users and developers actually
> contribute, consider moving the repository to a modern repo like github,
> offer a nice to use platform for everyone, don't be stuck with the dodgy
> sourceforge and become fakers like they are.


We are ambitious to migrate trac.vtiger.com to new-repository, our operation
team did experiment with Gitlab and confident to turn it to production
sooner.

Answer the question: Do you want us to contribute?


Yes - we appreciate it as always.

Regards,
Prasad
Vtiger Team


--
FB <http://www.facebook.com/vtiger> I Twit <http://twitter.com/vtigercrm> I
LIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/1270573?trk=tyah> I Blog
<https://blogs.vtiger.com> I Website <https://www.vtiger.com/>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Preexo <preexo at googlemail.com> wrote:

> I think having a 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and a 6.4 (4-5 versions) within this year
> sounds pretty damn good and like progress at first!!
> ... If there wasn't the on demand version which feels like it's already at
> 7.4. And officially this should still be the same product, right?
> Money... Money is nice, money is what drives us all. It's why I keep coming
> back here... Because it's my job and I earn money with this. So don't stop
> earning money, but running a successful open source project doesn't mean
> you
> can't earn money... vtiger has the potential of being part of this list:
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/2982622/open-source-tools/bossie-awards-2015-the-best-open-source-applications.html
> For sure all of them earn money and are still more open source than vtiger.
>
> The vtiger team should not feel pushed, but this really needs to be
> answered. I also think the gap between on demand and open source becomes
> more and more fishy. Is the open source project actually being abandoned
> very slowly?
>
> From my point of view:
> - The on demand can happily always offer more features than the os version.
> But vtiger should put those features up on the marketplace as modules so
> that we can buy those for our os installations and don't have to reinvent
> the wheel all the time.
> - The vtiger forum and this mailing list are very bad to use. So is the svn
> repository. If you want us open source users and developers actually
> contribute, consider moving the repository to a modern repo like github,
> offer a nice to use platform for everyone, don't be stuck with the dodgy
> sourceforge and become fakers like they are.
> - Answer the question: Do you want us to contribute? Do you want to
> actually
> live the open source spirit? Do you want to stop maintaining two products?
>
> @Stacey, do you actually know a fork of vtiger that is somewhere near ready
> to be joined?
>
>
> Stacey Johnson wrote
> > The answer is: Join or create alternative fork/project.
> > No open source spirit around vtiger core. Money.
> >
> > Stacey
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Simone Travaglini <
>
> > simonetravaglini@
>
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Alan I hope with your importance in community you will get an answer. :)
> >> Many people asked to know about long term plan... but not answer yet!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2015-10-16 13:57 GMT+02:00 Alan Lord <
>
> > alanslists@
>
> > >:
> >>
> >>> It's a shame something like this didn't get addressed in 6.4.0:
> >>>
> >>> http://trac.vtiger.com/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/8625
> >>>
> >>> In fact this is a pretty boring release with very little to warrant a
> >>> new
> >>> version number. It's seems more like a 6.3.1 to me.
> >>>
> >>> I also note that the gap between the On-Demand and Open Source versions
> >>> continues to grow wider... What is the long-term plan here?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >>> Al
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> http://www.vtiger.com/
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Simone Travaglini
> >> 328 5499846
> >> Linkedin: Simone Travaglini
> >>
> >>
> >> Rispetta l'ambiente: non stampare questa mail se non ti è veramente
> >> necessario!
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> http://www.vtiger.com/
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://www.vtiger.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://vtiger-crm.2324883.n4.nabble.com/Vtigercrm-developers-Custom-Date-Fields-still-broken-in-Reports-tp17722p17754.html
> Sent from the vtigercrm-developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.vtiger.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-developers/attachments/20151019/770baabc/attachment.html>