[Vtigercrm-developers] vt6 versus zf2

Stefan Warnat ich at stefanwarnat.de
Tue Feb 19 08:00:27 PST 2013


I don't have look at details of the vtiger6 structure vtiger6 and I 
think it isn't a perfect system,
but I think anything inside the modules directory will be deleted on 
release date and later modules will be only in vtiger6 directory.

My experience is, that files from "modules" Directory won't be used 
inside new vtiger6 theme.

But probably it's true, most/all vtiger developer prefer one hard 
redesign, without compatibility, before lots of little changes, which 
needs lots of tests/work with every version.

Freelancer at Webdevelopment

*Web*: http://www.stefanwarnat.de
*Xing*: https://www.xing.com/profile/Stefan_Warnat2
*eMail*: ich at stefanwarnat.de <mailto:ich at stefanwarnat.de>
*
Telefon*: 0162 / 2548568
(Werktags 12 - 18 Uhr)

Am 19.02.2013 16:36, schrieb Adam Heinz:
> "Keep the vtiger6 code operational?"  How about keeping the vtiger5 
> code operational?!  You forked your own modules to create the vtiger6 
> subfolder.  I have no idea how I'm supposed to merge a branch that 
> contains a partial copy of itself, much less attempt to preserve any 
> sort of merge/edit history.  This is the largest bowl of copy pasta 
> I've ever encountered in fifteen years of professional development. 
>  It shows a grave lack of restraint and/or understanding of how to 
> refactor a system while keeping it operational.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Prasad <prasad at vtiger.com 
> <mailto:prasad at vtiger.com>> wrote:
>
>     Adam,
>
>     We did have a look at several frameworks and evolved a simple one that
>     can give us better control to keep the vtiger6 code operational
>     with 5.x while
>     our dev-team is on making progress.
>
>     Please do share your feedback if you find anything essentially
>     lacking in vtiger6 framework.
>
>     Regards,
>     Prasad
>
>
>     On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Adam Heinz <amh at metricwise.net
>     <mailto:amh at metricwise.net>> wrote:
>
>         I'm poking around in vgcal right now and am extremely glad to
>         see how much Zend code it uses.  Did you guys consider using
>         ZendFramework 2 MVC instead of rolling your own for vtiger6?
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         http://www.vtiger.com/
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     http://www.vtiger.com/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.vtiger.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-developers/attachments/20130219/95d6daa7/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the vtigercrm-developers mailing list