[Vtigercrm-developers] vt6 versus zf2

[Adam Heinz]

"Keep the vtiger6 code operational?"  How about keeping the vtiger5 code
operational?!  You forked your own modules to create the vtiger6 subfolder.
 I have no idea how I'm supposed to merge a branch that contains a partial
copy of itself, much less attempt to preserve any sort of merge/edit
history.  This is the largest bowl of copy pasta I've ever encountered in
fifteen years of professional development.  It shows a grave lack of
restraint and/or understanding of how to refactor a system while keeping it
operational.


On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Prasad <prasad at vtiger.com> wrote:

> Adam,
>
> We did have a look at several frameworks and evolved a simple one that
> can give us better control to keep the vtiger6 code operational with 5.x
> while
> our dev-team is on making progress.
>
> Please do share your feedback if you find anything essentially lacking in
> vtiger6 framework.
>
> Regards,
> Prasad
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Adam Heinz <amh at metricwise.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm poking around in vgcal right now and am extremely glad to see how
>> much Zend code it uses.  Did you guys consider using ZendFramework 2 MVC
>> instead of rolling your own for vtiger6?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.vtiger.com/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.vtiger.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-developers/attachments/20130219/583fa7aa/attachment.html