[Vtigercrm-developers] 6.5.0 Release Update

Prasad prasad at vtiger.com
Tue Jun 28 15:16:25 GMT 2016


Vtiger Core (User Management, Eventing, Workflows, Module Management...)
has been the same on both Ondemand and Opensource - which is reason why
most of the extension developed for Opensource would work well for Ondemand

Some core-enhancements (ex.User Managment based on Edition) is not best-fit
would be removed from Opensource. So there would always be a difference -
we do give importance to keep the difference as minimal as possible or be
reviewed during the integration.


FB <http://www.facebook.com/vtiger> I Twit <http://twitter.com/vtigercrm> I
LIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/1270573?trk=tyah> I Blog
<https://blogs.vtiger.com> I Website <https://www.vtiger.com/>

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Simone Travaglini <
simonetravaglini at gmail.com> wrote:

> Alan got the point.
> I understand that ondemand version have more feature avaiable than open
> source. But the problem is if core it's not the same. So I hope vtiger team
> will understand that: we need that they realign opensource with ondemand
> core, and they can offer ondemand more future than open source. In present
> situation seems that open source and ondemand are 2 different product.
> 2016-06-28 16:20 GMT+02:00 Alan Bell <alan.bell at libertus.co.uk>:
>> You can do a fork on code.vtiger.com just as easily as you can on
>> github. You can fork it and add new features and contribute them back. I do
>> this. I wrote the instructions here
>> http://code.vtiger.com/vtiger/vtigercrm on how to fork it, fix or change
>> something and contribute back your improvements.
>> There have been some issues getting prompt reviews of merge requests, and
>> I have raised concerns about that and many fixes got in, along with a few
>> features. There is a ton more in the pipeline and I have a fork with a
>> comprehensive update of all the javascript libraries (doesn't fully work
>> yet, I haven't had time to complete it and my country seems to have just
>> broken, which is a bit of a distraction).
>> Doing a branding fork, creating "wtiger" or whatever is a *heap* of work
>> and risk I don't want to do, and customers are asking for help with their
>> vtiger, not yetiforce or sugarcrm or anything else.
>> If there was a really convincing number of unloved merge requests, then I
>> might be tempted to do something but there really isn't. If I was to
>> suggest a change, I really want the on-demand stuff to be resynced with the
>> open source project, the open source code should lead the on-demand
>> platform because I don't want to waste my time doing stuff that has already
>> been done, perhaps in an incompatible way.
>> Alan.
>> On 28/06/16 12:11, Garry Brighton wrote:
>>> @socialboostdk - mate, how long are you here? Read archive and see how
>>> long things here are in "talking" progress...
>>> I am not frustrated because of vtiger guys, I am frustrated that
>>> community here can not find alternative
>>> but holds vtiger foot like there is nothing behind them... few of you
>>> are really great programmers.. join together
>>> and do little fork on github, no need any marketing/money, just honest
>>> contribution and fair merging....
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.vtiger.com/
> --
> Simone Travaglini
> 328 5499846
> Linkedin: Simone Travaglini
> Rispetta l'ambiente: non stampare questa mail se non ti è veramente
> necessario!
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.vtiger.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-developers/attachments/20160628/e0aa2d57/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the vtigercrm-developers mailing list