<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">personally I would go with the vtiger
public license for the main vtigerish bits of it, the module.php
and so on, with anything else you are including (libraries or
whatever) clearly separated and under whatever license is
appropriate. I wouldn't go for closed stuff, if people wanted that
then they wouldn't be using vtiger. You can sell Free software, no
problem with that at all.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html</a><br>
<br>
Alan.<br>
<br>
On 25/09/14 17:29, Simone Travaglini wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAM+COA65JGSkBgb5kd9-qFcY4U5ZsJ4TncmUu4=gnQ0pdF53yQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hello,
<div>we are developing a module for extension store, and we need
to decide which licence use to distribute. Any suggestion? Who
have already published extension how resolved this problem?
Open source or closed?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks <br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
Simone Travaglini<br>
328 5499846<br>
Linkedin: Simone Travaglini <br>
<br>
<br>
<span style="color:rgb(51,204,0)">Rispetta l'ambiente: non
stampare questa mail se non ti č veramente necessario!</span><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.vtiger.com/">http://www.vtiger.com/</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Libertus Solutions
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://libertus.co.uk">http://libertus.co.uk</a></pre>
</body>
</html>