<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body >Team,
<br>
<br>This is yet another breakage from ourside which is not excusable.
<br>Having a better control over GA release is as lame as any other excuses come by, it holds no water.
<br>I sincerely regret this breakage.
<br>
<br>The core team is not excused of this fault. This will be made certain of.
<br>Fathi, your anger is truly well justified.
<br>Fathi, there is no restriction on speaking about reality. You are not seen by anyone
<br>to be the bad guy.
<br>
<br>I am the bad guy if at all anyone can be called that.
<br>It is my responsibility and I failed in it.
<br>
<br>From here on, Fathi will be consulted before we have a release. He will be the defacto
<br>namer of the release in other words.
<br>Yes, you could say that we had do better to read the release document but I would respectfully
<br> disagree as if we had made sense of the naming convention, we would have fixed ourselves by now.
<br> But, as we all see, we have conveniently disregarded the convention causing much consternation.
<br>Let this be the immediate punishment till Fathi feels that we are good enough to
<br>name the releases properly and lets us act independently.
<br>
<br>Remco, I can understand your chagrin too.
<br>I am pained and there is no excuse.
<br>I have mentioned the punishment to be put into effect immediately till we earn our 'naming laurel'.
<br>
<br>Let me assure you, the core team does not believe in 1 man shows. This is a team effort and your views
<br>are important.
<br>
<br>Richie<br><br><br><br><br>---- Fathi Boudra<fboudra@free.fr> wrote ---- <br><br><blockquote style='border-left: 2px solid #0000FF; padding: 6px;'><html>
<xbody>
hi gopal,<br><br>> My only intention was to get more feedback from our developer community, so<br>> that we can have a better control over GA release.<br><br>Could you explain me, how not respecting naming conventions help you to have a <br>better control over GA release ?<br><br>> So far we have gathered about 100 issues from our community, which may not<br>> be possible with our core team in India. <br><br>and ? is it a way to tell that core team do what they want ? I don't <br>understand what you mean or maybe you must clearly rewrite your sentence.<br><br>> I apologize for breaking the release management process this time.<br>> Thanks for your understanding,<br><br>Sorry, i don't understand. Respecting naming conventions is a basic request <br>for release management that has been requested the first time in <br>ferbruary/march. your decision to not follow it cannot be justified by your <br>explanation which is far from credible.<br><br>My apologies to be again the bad guy who talk about the reality.<br><br>cheers,<br><br>Fathi<br><br>PS: and i don't talk about your licensing issue this time ...<br>_______________________________________________<br>Get started with creating presentations online - <a href="http://zohoshow.com?vt">http://zohoshow.com?vt</a> <br>
</xbody>
</html></blockquote></body></html>