<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body >Hello Team!<br>Good to know that we have an active discussion on here.<br>Mike and myself had discussed using gforge and it is a beast to work with.<br><br>As we are all working on this together, Mike has volunteered to get the<br>forge running. The easiest to get to work was the current one he is using.<br>Having said that, we had also asked for earlier suggestions for forge but<br>we did not get many easy to use systems.<br><br>Mike, on his own initiative found out the current solution and has done <br>admirably till now.<br><br>I would suggest that we get the forge up and running and then we can always<br>move to svn or some better system that comes along in due course of time.<br><br>I would request whoever can help Mike to please stand up and raise their hands<br>so that it takes off some load off Mike.<br><br>Please note, it is a question of convenience right now and we have to make do <br>with what we have. On hindsight, it always seem better to have a different <br>solution but that is 'after' things have happened. When we needed a solution,<br>we did not get any and Mike happened to make one work. So why not proceed with <br>it?<br><br>Fahi, I do understand your point and Sak was just pointing out the facts that<br>had occured before you joined the list. We are in this together and there is <br>no sole ownership. We just chip in whatever we can, whenever we can.<br>Mike has high regards for everyone over here and we actively look forward<br>to help Mike out with the cvs/svn. Mike has a free hand there.<br><br>Mike can appoint whoever he wants to appoint to help him. He just needs to keep<br>us guys updated. <br><br>So, looking forward to Mike's forge getting GA!<br><br>In Mike +!<br><br>Richie<br><br><br><br>----sergiokessler@gmail.com wrote ---- <br><br>does it require ldap ??<br>it can't be used without it ?<br><br>/sak<br><br>On 1/26/06, Joe Stewart <joestewart@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:<br>> Fathi Boudra wrote:<br>> > hi all,<br>> ><br>> > i've done a post on the forum as i didn't see this previous thread :<br>> ><br>> >>i searched the forums to find how/why we have chosen myxoopsforge/novell<br>> >>forge for vtiger forge and didn't find a clear answer to my question.<br>> >><br>> >>a bit history (feel free to correct me)<br>> >><br>> >>myxoopsforge is built on top of xoops a CMS.<br>> >>it's a young project, relatively not widespread, based on a project that his<br>> >>primary goal isn't to be a collaborative development environment.<br>> >><br>> >>novell forge is based on xoopsforge (built also on top of xoops).<br>> >>also, it's a young project, relatively not widespread, hacked by novell to<br>> >>support novell feature like ichain and edirectory.<br>> >><br>> >>beside these solutions, we have well known widespread project collaborative<br>> >>development environment like gforge or savannah/gna.<br>> >><br>> >>i don't really understant this choice. thanks, if someone can answer to this<br>> >>question.<br>> >><br>> >>clearly, i would like to use a professional environment like gforge.<br>> >><br>> >>i saw many question about version control system to use and for this,<br>> >>i would like to support subversion. From my point of view, cvs was<br>> >>deprecated. We have more and more projects switching from cvs to svn.<br>> >>for new projects, nobody use cvs, and for people using it, it's easy to<br>> >>switch to svn.<br>> >><br>> >>we need a clear choice for these tools from vtiger core team,<br>> >>and probably some guidelines.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > thanks to sergio to point me here. after reading the "Why not gforge (for the<br>> > record!)" thread, i found other peoples feeling like me.<br>> ><br>> > to resume, we didn't use gforge because it's difficult to setup.<br>> ><br>><br>> Only to chime in on this point. The debian gforge packages are not hard<br>> to install. The hardest part is answering the ldap questions. The<br>> maintainers have been packaging sourceforge for a long time and it shows.<br>><br>> But it does take more support than a more simple solution. And it<br>> scales for future needs. I have installed and maintained gforge in the<br>> past.<br>><br>> I know Mike said he was using Gentoo but just wanted to clarify this point.<br>><br>><br>> Does xoopsforge provide for vhosts per project? Or shell access? This<br>> may be something to consider. I know it has a wiki, but that isn't the<br>> same.<br>><br>><br>> later,<br>><br>> Joe<br>><br>> > is it possible to discuss at this progress state of vtigerforge or we can't go<br>> > back definitively from novell forge choice ?<br>> ><br>> > cheers,<br>> ><br>> > Fathi<br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> vtigercrm-developers mailing list<br>> vtigercrm-developers@lists.vtigercrm.com<br>> http://lists.vtigercrm.com/mailman/listinfo/vtigercrm-developers<br>><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>vtigercrm-developers mailing list<br>vtigercrm-developers@lists.vtigercrm.com<br>http://lists.vtigercrm.com/mailman/listinfo/vtigercrm-developers<br></body></html>