[Vtigercrm-developers] Lazy question on webservices.

[Vikas Jain]

Alan,

You could have used uitype 3 for this? Just a thought.

On 25 September 2012 19:04, Adam Heinz <amh at metricwise.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Vikas Jain <vikas at vtiger.com> wrote:
> > Your point seems to be valid and these fields should be allowed to be
> > updated from REST, I'm trying to think of
> > use cases that might be affected by allowing this displaytype 2 fields
> to be
> > updated and their consequences.
>
> I think this just a specific case of the more general field access
> problem.  If displaytype were on vtiger_profile2field instead of
> vtiger_field, Alan could easily create a new user+role+profile with
> the necessary permissions.
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.vtiger.com/
>



-- 
Regards
Vikas
Vtiger Team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-developers/attachments/20121001/d83d021f/attachment.html