[Vtigercrm-developers] 4.2.4 installer creates tables as MyISAM

Sergio A. Kessler sergiokessler at gmail.com
Fri Feb 24 05:32:58 PST 2006


On 2/23/06, Mike Fedyk <mfedyk at mikefedyk.com> wrote:
> Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
>
> >Mike Fedyk wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Ok, we have a modified adodb in vtiger 4.2.3.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I sympathize for any breakage that might result from my adodb updates, and
> >have tried to make them single-commit to ease reverts if needed.
> >
> >My goal has been to find out to where vtigercrm deviates from production
> >adodb (currently adodb-4.72) and reduce the question of bundling vs
> >external dependency to a minimum diff needed to run.
> >
> >
> >
> >>It allows you to specify <opt>Type=InnoDB</opt> in the XML file. And
> >>updating adodb breaks that.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Is the use of InnoDB storage necessary for mysql operation, or was it just
> >a performance-seeking choice?
> >
> >
>
> Do you want transactions?
> Do you want versioned updates like in postgres?
> Do you want journaled writes?
> Do you want foreign key constraints?

he, if I really want this, I just may use postgresql  :-)

IMO depending on a very specific table type in mysql is a bug.
even more when that specific table type is already planned to go
deprecated in future versions
(mysql AB has already hired people to develop the own storage engine
with transaction support, now that InnoDB pertain to oracle)


>
> In fact, as far as licenses are concerned, Postgres is more vulnerable
> to being bought by a commercial company than Mysql/InnoDB.  At least
> with the GPL you know they can't make a non-public fork and distribute
> it without also distributing the code.

two gross errors here:

1) you can't buy postgresql, postgresql is a project, not a company.

2) if a company buys Mysql AB, they CAN fork a non-public version
without the need for ditributing the code, because mysql is DUAL
licensed (GPL and a normal comercial licence), and Mysql AB has all
the copyrigths.
(altough the old GPL version must remain in public, and could be
mantained by the community)

and when you own the copyrigths you can change the licence of future
versions all the times you want (you can't change old released
versions).
(have you never seen GPL projects that went propietary ?)


> Postgres may blow Mysql away in feature support, but vulnerability to
> being bought out is not one of Mysql's weak points.  Next.

yes, it is.
it is worth discussing it ?, or should the vtiger project be worried
about this ? I don't think so.

/sak




More information about the vtigercrm-developers mailing list