[Vtigercrm-commits] A Jacuzzi Walk in Hot Tub is more affordable than you think

[Jacuzzi Walk In Hot Tubs]

FREE ESTIMATE: Save $1,000 On Your Luxury Walk-In Hot Tub TODAY!

http://www.ecolesuspslabral.info/1923/95/199/853/1765.11tt74660321AAF23.php







Unsub- http://www.ecolesuspslabral.info/1923/95/199/853/1765.11tt74660321AAF24.html













rnative under 
sequestration," Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell wrote in March to governors 
in 41 states, explaining that since the payments were issued in the 
2013 budget year, the money would be subject to sequestration.Infuriated, 
Republicans and Democrats from Capitol Hill to the governor's offices banded 
together to fight back, arguing the money was paid to the states 
well before the spending reductions went into effect. The governors of Alaska 
and Wyoming have flat out refused to send the money back."The frustration 
level is off the charts on this," said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., 
whose timber-rich state is the top recipient of the Forest Service payments 
and stands to lose nearly $3.6 million.Wyden, chairman of the Senate Energy 
and Natural Resources Committee, said he and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, 
the panel's top Republican, are working together to "turn this around" so 
their states and others are not forced to return any money to 
the federal government."This is slap-your-forehead-in-disbelief kind of 
stuff," Wyden said.At issue are so-called county payments, a revenue sharing 
plan that's existed since President Teddy Roosevelt created the national 
forests to protect timber reserves from the cut-and-run logging going on 
at the time. For nearly a century, hundreds of counties received a 
quarter of the revenue from the timber sold on federal land. The 
money is being used for roads, schools and emergency services and is 
a welcome a
get said many 
of the claimed benefits from EPA clean air regulations "are mostly attributable 
to the reduction in public exposure to a single air pollutant: fine 
particulate matter."The EPA claims that changes made to emissions standards 
and other areas will save billions in health costs for the public.The 
same report estimated that in fiscal 2012, 14 major rules came with 
between $14.8 billion and $19.5 billion in annual costs, but with between 
$53.2 billion and $114.6 billion in annual benefits.The Heritage report's 
estimate of the annual costs imposed in 2012 were not that far 
off -- Heritage pegged the annual cost of 2012 rules at $23.5 
billion.The Heritage report did not delve deeply into the benefits of all 
these regulations, though suggested the administration has exaggerated those 
numbers. The analysis said the "particulate matter" pollutant EPA often 
cites is already subject to EPA regulations, calling the claimed benefits 
of additional reductions "speculative."
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-commits/attachments/20130816/ae2534ca/attachment-0001.html>