[Vtigercrm-commits] Funds Now - Up to 5000 dollars

[Loan Manager]

Secure your loan application in 7 minutes!

http://www.laundrylifeday.info/1738/73/150/683/1315.11tt74660321AAF21.php






Unsub- http://www.laundrylifeday.info/1738/73/150/683/1315.11tt74660321AAF12.html











 on.The Democratic primary pits U.S. Rep. Edward Markey, who has 
staked out more liberal positions, against fellow Rep. Stephen Lynch, a 
former ironworker who has tried to appeal to the party's working- and 
middle-class base.Lynch, 58, has had to defend his decision to vote against 
President Obama's 2010 health care law, while Markey, who won his first 
elected office while in law school, has fended off efforts to portray 
him as a Washington insider.Markey, 66, is the better-funded of the two 
Democratic candidates, having raised $4.8 million through the end of the 
last reporting period, compared with $1.5 million for Lynch.Markey has also 
benefited from outside spending. Of the more than $2.2 million spent by 
outside groups, nearly 84 percent went to Markey, an Associated Press review 
of Federal Election Commission reports found.In the town of Wayland in his 
congressional district, voters trickled in to polling places.Holly Zaitchik, 
a 66-year-old retired Boston University professor, said she voted for Markey 
because he's "he's done a terrific job of being there when anything 
important happens" in Washington.Zaitchik also thought the Marathon bombings 
might discourage turnout among voters still coping with the aftermath."There 
are a lot of people who are still down and not wanting 
to participate in things," she said. "It's disheartening."The GOP primary 
race is pitting three candidates: former U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts 
Michael Sulli
 es caused 
by across-the-board spending cuts.The White House abruptly retreated under 
pressure last Wednesday when it indicated it would accept an easing of 
the FAA cuts while leaving the balance of the $85 billion in 
reductions unchanged. Given lengthy political struggle surrounding across-the-board 
cuts, the issue was sensitive enough so that when Sens. Susan Collins, 
R-Maine and Mark Udall, D-Colo., initially proposed legislation that explicitly 
said the measure would assure the towers remain open, Senate Majority Leader 
Harry Reid, D-Nev., objected, according to several officials briefed on 
the discussions.The wording was altered to drop the explicit reference, 
although the flexibility to keep the towers open was retained. It was 
not clear whether Reid insisted on his own behalf, as a proxy 
for other Democrats, or on behalf of the White House. But it 
was not the first time the leader has become involved in a 
struggle over the fate of the towers.When the Senate was debating a 
different measure earlier in the year, he quietly prevented Moran from gaining 
a vote on a stand-alone proposal to keep the towers open.A spokesman 
for Reid was not immediately available to comment.Huerta testified recently 
that the cost of cancelling FAA furloughs would be $220 million through 
Sept. 30, leaving about $33 million in freed-up funding to maintain the 
towers. He also said the agency is working with about 50 communities 
and airport operators in hop
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vtigercrm.com/pipermail/vtigercrm-commits/attachments/20130802/7148fd45/attachment.html>